翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Vermont Transit Lines ・ Vermont Translines ・ Vermont Treatment Program for Sexual Abusers ・ Vermont Units In the Civil War ・ Vermont v. Brillion ・ Vermont v. New York ・ Vermont Valley Railroad ・ Vermont Veterans Medal ・ Vermont Vista, Los Angeles ・ Vermont Voltage ・ Vermont Wild ・ Vermont wine ・ Vermont Wing Civil Air Patrol ・ Vermont Working Families Party ・ Vermont World War II Army Airfields ・ Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. ・ Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant ・ Vermont Youth Orchestra with Trey Anastasio & Ernie Stires ・ Vermont – Macedonia National Guard Partnership ・ Vermont's 1st congressional district ・ Vermont's 1st congressional district special election, 1808 ・ Vermont's 2nd congressional district ・ Vermont's 2nd congressional district special election, 1797 ・ Vermont's 3rd congressional district ・ Vermont's 4th congressional district ・ Vermont's 5th congressional district ・ Vermont's 6th congressional district ・ Vermont's at-large congressional district ・ Vermont's at-large congressional district special election, 1824 ・ Vermont's congressional districts Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. ''Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council'', 435 U.S. 519 (1978), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a court cannot impose rulemaking procedures on a federal government agency. The federal Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 and an agency's statutory mandate from Congress establish the maximum requirements for an agency's rulemaking (and adjudicative) process. An agency may grant additional procedural rights in the regulatory process (within constitutional and statutory limits), but a reviewing court cannot "impose upon the agency its own notion of which procedures are 'best' or most likely to further some vague, undefined public good." (435 U.S. at 549.) To do so would exceed the limits of judicial review of agency action. ==Subsequent developments== The case was remanded for the circuit court to determine whether the Table S-3 rule was adequately supported by the administrative record. After the NRC revised the rule, the Natural Resources Defense Council filed for judicial review of the new regulation, leading to a second Supreme Court case, ''Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.'', 462 U.S. 78 (1983). 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.